That could change in the future, but I’m at the mercy of what NVIDIA wants to send, and when it wants to send it.
To nip a question in the bud: we do not have Quadro RTX cards in the lab. What I am not entirely sure on at this point is whether or not RTX feature sets will vary at all in the future between GeForce and Quadro.Īrchitecture: GTX & TITAN = Pascal RTX = Turing Performance from Pascal to Turing has seen a nice boost as it is, but the future prospects of RTX features being taken advantage of is what makes the new Quadros (and GeForces) exciting.įor those hoping to get great performance on the cheap, you’ll be happy to know that GeForces will handle all three of the tasks on this page without issue. Even the RTX 5000 is attractive at its price-point in comparison to the last-gen P5000, though that could be said about all of the RTX cards. If 48GB is actually too much VRAM, or you’re wanting to save a few thousand dollars, the 24GB RTX 6000 is going to be a worthy consideration. Turing has so far infused three GPUs for both GeForce and Quadro, with the top-dog being the Quadro RTX 8000, priced at $10,000. It’s also Volta-based, but has TITAN Xp-matching levels of VRAM, at 12GB.ġ GDDR6 + ECC 2 GDDR6 3 GDDR5X + ECC 4 GDDR5Xĥ GDDR5 + ECC 6 GDDR5 7 HBM2 + ECC 8 HBM2Īrchitecture: P = Pascal V = Volta RTX = Turing
TITAN V could easily belong in the GeForce table, but given its focus, it’s worthier of being on the Quadro side.
At the moment, most of NVIDIA’s current-gen GeForces and Quadros are Turing-based, with the Volta-based GV100 proving to still be a good choice for those with specific deep-learning needs (and a lot of memory bandwidth).
0 kommentar(er)
